Welcome! This is the fifteenth post in my vaccine series. You may have missed Getting Serious, 10 Bad Reasons Not to Vaccinate, Why “Science” Should Be Carefully Evaluated, What is Herd Immunity All About, How the Immune System Works, Ingredients in Vaccines Part 1, Ingredients in Vaccines, Part 2, Risk-Benefit Analysis: MMR, Risk-Benefit Analysis: DTaP, Risk-Benefit Analysis: Chicken Pox, Hib, Flu, Risk-Benefit Analysis: Pneumoccocal, Meningococcal and HPV, Risk-Benefit Analysis: Hep A, B and Rotavirus, What About Alternative Schedules? or How to Protect Unvaccinated Kids.
It’s unfortunate, but much of this debate is completely unreasonable. That is, people get riled up and rely on scare tactics, anger and fear instead of facts; and they don’t believe that people have the right to make their own decisions. This leads to some pretty scary and sometimes hostile statements from ” vaccine pushers” that can be difficult, in the heat of the moment, to respond to. Today we’ll talk about some of the most common excuses given by these pushers and responses you can use.
What’s a ” Vaccine Pusher?”
There are people who do choose to vaccinate, in part or in full, who believe that it is an individual decision for each family to make. Vaccinating works for them.
I am not talking about these families.
A vaccine pusher is someone who believes that everyone ought to vaccinate, with every vaccine currently recommended, on the CDC schedule, with no choice. If any new vaccines are added, they ought to get those too, without questions. Families should not have a choice, and those who try to do anything other than the CDC schedule are abusing or neglecting their children and their duty to society, and should be at a minimum, publicly ridiculed; and at a maximum, have their children removed from their home and forcibly vaccinated. They champion laws that would limit exemptions to extreme medical cases and other lack-of-choice legislature.
I have words for those who believe this:
You have absolutely no right to talk to anyone that way, ever. You have no leg to stand on with this argument. You have the right to decide for yourself and your family alone. You do not have the right to compel others to accept the risk of vaccination or any other medical treatment. I have nothing but disgust and contempt for those who believe they can and should force their beliefs on others in this manner. I really cannot express the depth of my contempt for people who push vaccination on others.
Fear is a Powerful Motivator
For most families, when they have newly arrived at a decision to forego or delay vaccination, they are worried. They are researching fervently, hoping to solidify their choice and stop their fear that “something might happen.” They are worried about what could happen if they do vaccinate, and if they don’t.
It is these people that vaccine pushers target. There are people like me, who, after extensive research, stand very firm in their decision not to vaccinate their children, and no amount of scare tactics will sway them. They show disgust and contempt for people like me and try to stir up anger and use peer pressure, but they don’t target me directly. The people who are still fearful, though — these are the people they target.
Every terrible story that comes out in the media — “This one child died or almost died of a vaccine-preventable disease! We all need to remember little Suzy’s story next time we think that vaccines aren’t important! — are scare tactics, plain and simple. And they have no place in this very important debate, and I mentioned in my first post in this series.
However, that doesn’t mean it will stop happening.
Vaccine pushers know that fear is a powerful motivator, and they use it to their advantage. They use these stories and sometimes manipulated statistics (or even outright lies, in some cases) to try to scare parents into vaccinating.
Let’s look at some of the most common claims now, and take the fear out of them. As well as giving you something to say in response!
Vaccine Claims and Answers
Claim: “If you don’t vaccinate, you’re putting my child at risk.”
Response: “It is your job to protect your child, and my job to protect mine. Vaccines come with risks that I’m not comfortable taking.” I really don’t like this ‘collectivist’ reasoning anyway. We are all individuals who, in the majority of cases, need to protect ourselves, and then worry about our contributions to society. We do have responsibilities to others but not to the extent to place ourselves at risk if we are uncomfortable doing so. If you have a new baby, stay home or wear that baby close to your body. If you have a medically fragile child, it isn’t only “vaccine preventable” diseases that could harm him/her, it’s any form of illness, and you must take proper precautions all the time. Expecting others to be aware of all your needs and take extreme measures to protect you is wrong. Now, as I said in a previous post, I believe that staying home when you are ill is a social responsibility, and being extra careful about going near newborns or people you know are medically fragile if you even think you might be getting sick or have been exposed is a good idea. That, you can and should do, because it presents very little burden to you. Feel free to point this out.
Claim: “Don’t you know your child is going to die?”
Response: “These diseases are extremely uncommon today, and even if my child does get them, I know enough about the signs and symptoms to seek medical care if needed. The serious complications are extremely rare, fewer than 1 in 10,000 in many cases.” There’s a whole lot more you could say about this if pressed. People like to mention the very rare complications but they act as if everyone who catches the disease will end up with these complications, which is simply untrue. See my risk-benefit analysis posts for specifics on how often these complications actually occur in various diseases.
Claim: “You just don’t know how dangerous these diseases are. If you did, you’d vaccinate.”
Response: “These diseases were actually not dangerous in the vast majority of cases. There will always be complications for a few, but this is not the majority.” Again, see the risk-benefit analysis posts for specific statistics on just how rare these complications are. I’d argue that many people who vaccinate, especially vaccine pushers, are actually far more terrified of the diseases than they actually need to be. And if they come back and say “What if it happened to your child,” you can simply respond, “What if my child had a bad vaccine reaction? Speculating gets us nowhere. There is risk to anything.”
Claim: “How will you feel when these diseases become epidemic again? Pertussis cases are already rising. It’s your fault.”
Response: “The majority of these cases are occurring in fully vaccinated individuals due to vaccine failure. If you want to blame me, our conversation is over.” Don’t take that ‘it’s your fault’ junk. Don’t even discuss it, don’t argue with it, don’t deal with it at all. If someone wants to name call or be rude, then there’s no point in debating them.
Claim: “Child services ought to/will come and take your child(ren) away if you don’t vaccinate.”
Response: “In many states, it is actually considered a false report and illegal for CPS to get involved simply because a family does not vaccinate.” Look up your state’s laws, as some are stricter than others. www.nvic.org is a good place to look. This does happen, sadly, in a few states, and I suggest securing a legal waiver as soon as possible (even before your children are school age) and finding a lawyer or joining the Homeschool Legal Defense (HSLD) if you are in a state with stricter laws. This will help to protect you. And as for ‘ought’ to take your children…end the conversation immediately. Don’t go there.
Claim: “Well, you can’t put them in public school, and you shouldn’t take them to any other public places either.”
Response: “All states allow for unvaccinated children to attend public school with some form of waiver. As long as my children are not sick, there is no reason they should not be in public.” Two states have only a medical waiver, but the rest have religious and/or philosophical, which allows your child(ren) to attend public school unvaccinated. www.nvic.org can tell you your state’s laws. As for the silly idea that unvaccinated children shouldn’t be allowed in public, there’s no issue if they are not sick! If they are or if you know, for example, that your child has just been exposed to chicken pox, keep them home. But unvaccinated children are not walking disease-carriers. You may also choose to say, “Recently vaccinated children can shed viruses and make other children ill, yet they aren’t told to stay clear of public spaces. Perhaps they should be.” Of course that’s a bit argumentative….
Claim: “You are an anti-science whack job with a tinfoil hat. Everyone knows vaccines are the greatest public health breakthrough.”
Response: End the conversation immediately. Walk away. Don’t engage. There is no response needed to this. It is an absolutely ridiculous and enraging idea but there is no logic behind it. Anyone who says this doesn’t actually understand or care to understand your position and you shouldn’t waste your breath arguing. Anyone who talks like this and thinks it’s appropriate is lower than low. Insults are never appropriate and are a sign of a complete lack of an argument and no ability to use complex reasoning.
Claim: “You know that anti-vaccination is just a conspiracy theory, right? There’s no actual science behind it.”
Response: “There is quite a bit of science to support the idea that vaccinations may be harmful. Please check out the CDC’s Pink Book and read the vaccine package inserts. I’d be happy to point you towards other accepted medical sources as well.” Assuming that the person saying this actually believes it and isn’t trying to be deliberately inflammatory, point them towards the science.
Claim: “Anti-vaccinators are dangerous, because they spread lies.”
Response: “I am not anti-vaccine. I am for choice. If others would like to vaccinate, they may choose to do so. Please take a look at the science.” The first part is important: most people who are against vaccinations are against them for their own family. They do not try to tell others what they ‘should’ do. They aim to educate gently to help people come to their own decisions. Pro-vaccinators, on the other hand, are anti-choice, which is why they have no leg to stand on. You can also point them towards plenty of scientific sources that clearly state the potential dangers of vaccines, but most people who call you a liar are not actually interested in what the science really says.
The Bottom Line
Some people will say these things out of sheer ignorance, because they have heard them repeated frequently in the media. Some will say them in confusion, looking for confirmation or answers. Engage them, answer them, speak to them gently. Point them towards the CDC’s Pink Book, the WHO disease position papers, and the vaccine package inserts to begin their research. Honest questions should be answered, and answered respectfully!
Others, the true “pushers,” will say these just to be inflammatory and rude. Don’t engage them. It’s hard, but just walk away. They are stuck in their indefensible position and there’s nothing that you can say to change their minds. Ignore, avoid, do not debate them. I refuse to do so anymore because it is not worth my time, stress, or frustration. Usually these are not people who can actually do anything about your ability to make a choice, so there is no point.
The most important part is that if you do talk about vaccines, do it calmly and rationally. Point people towards studies. Use common sense. Don’t get angry or frustrated or make broad statements that you can’t back up with data. This position, despite being the only correct one (that people should have a choice, not that people shouldn’t vaccinate), is extremely difficult to defend these days because of all the vitriol being spewed by the mainstream. It’s not helped when people make broad, emotional statements that lack science.
Be patient, persistent, and always point back to the data. The small minority of voices will grow in strength if they are calm and have data on their sides. That should be our point always — what the science actually shows. We’re accused of being anti-science and that isn’t true, of course; we need to constantly be reminding everyone of that!
Final Thoughts
Next week will be the series wrap-up. Three months later and we’re finally done! If you have any additional questions about vaccines that have not been answered by this series, please leave them for me and I’ll do my best to address them next week.
What types of comments do you hear from ‘vaccine pushers?’ How do you handle it?
Like what you’ve read? Subscribe so you never miss a post! You can also follow us on Facebook or Pinterest. Thanks for reading!
TESTING!
Great article!
I want to warn people that there is a nationwide push to change vaccine exemption laws to make them tougher for people who want to opt out. If this isn’t currently happening in your state you can expect it to be happening soon, unfortunately. So get active, join a vaccine choice coalition in your state (or form one) and talk to your state legislators.
Good, good article. I came to this decision (not to vaccinate) with my husband a couple of years ago. I had worried about it for 20 years, had two daughters who had negative reactions to vaccination, and finally, with our last daughter (now 12), got brave enough to opt out. I personally wish I had had the courage to opt out YEARS ago. I don’t judge ANYONE who feels they need to vaccinate.
I have also found that “a gentle answer (usually) turns away wrath.” I also do not engage in defending myself. I just smile and say, “You know, different people have vastly different opinions on this. I think we need to agree to disagree.” (More smiling!)
It is very interesting to me that many folks who would firmly argue that “choice” for abortion is absolutely essential, but that “choice” for vaccination is reprehensible!!
I understand your concern with this subject, but as a nurse I’ve seen what happens when people choose not to vaccinate(yes I am a pusher), I’ve seen a 3 day old infant die in her mothers arms because she caught whooping cough from her unvaccinated mother as soon as she was born and while it was mild to the mother it’s incredibly deadly to the baby(as are most vaccine preventable diseases). The whole reason for vaccinations is to build up your immune system to it for everyday encounters, but you can still get it from someone who is infected. Because of letting people choose, you might as well get rid of the vaccines because it’s almost pointless. I’ve been seeing all of these diseases come back that we haven’t seen since we’ve gotten the vaccine, and it makes it harder to counteract it because none of us has had to do anything for these in our careers. Even vaccinated people and children come into our ER with these now because they were exposed to an unvaccinated infected person(it’s been happening a lot in day cares) I understand that it’s scary getting these vaccines sometimes and can lead to suspicion from the government, but i can tell you from my own experience the vaccine is much less harmful than the actual disease. It really hits harder to home for both parents and our staff when we see a child die of a vaccine preventable disease, and it just makes us feel even more hopeless about the growing number of these returning diseases.
Jessica,
That’s a very skewed perspective. The majority of people who have caught whooping cough are fully vaccinated, and it’s happening in highly vaccinated areas. I’ve had vaccine supporters tell me that there is no herd immunity for pertussis because one cannot obtain full immunity from either natural infection or vaccination. Some even blame the DTaP for introducing pertussis back into the adult community, which then exposes helpless babies. A lack of breastfeeding is also partially responsible for young infants getting sick, not only from pertussis but also from other diseases.
Perhaps the solution is trying to increase breastfeeding rates, and training medical professionals to actually recognize and know how to treat these illnesses (which, outside of young infants, are typically not dangerous and often do not require professional treatment anyway). This way, in the extreme or serious cases, doctors and nurses are prepared to offer appropriate treatments early in the disease process. Just because these diseases are rare does not mean they don’t happen, and not training doctors to recognize and treat them is a huge hole in medical training! I don’t feel at all responsible for a doctor’s lack of education.
You would definitely see, from your experience, the disease as worse than the vaccine. You vaccinate or see children who are vaccinated daily. Most reactions take at least a few hours to show up, so you don’t see them in the hospital or clinic setting. Parents see those at home. In contrast, you don’t see all the cases of these diseases that resolve without help, because they don’t come to you. Instead you see the absolute worst-case scenarios, the ones who have to be hospitalized. This is not an accurate perception of how many people actually have these diseases, since you never see any mild cases.
So, again, your perspective is skewed. You don’t see the vaccine reactions, and you only see the worst-case scenarios in these diseases. And I understand that, but it’s NOT an excuse to push vaccines on people. Vaccines DO come with the risk of harm and no one can be compelled to accept that risk without a choice. It’s not okay, period.
@Jessica. “I’ve been seeing all of these diseases come back that we haven’t seen since we’ve gotten the vaccine”. I want you to REALLY READ your own comment. Without you ego, without anger and hostility. Look at your statement as if someone else wrote it ok?
You by your own admission have just confirmed what everyone is speaking about. The problem is the vaccines CONTAIN THE VIRUS!!!!
@Jessica:
Study: Whooping cough outbreak linked to vaccinated children
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323187#ixzz1syXmmwh2
CDC Admits: 2008 Smallpox Outbreak in US Caused by Vaccine
http://www.gaia-health.com/articles401/000419-smallpox-vaccine-outbreak.shtml
80% to 90% of WA state pertussis cases are in the vaccinated – Skagit County Health Department http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/80-to-90-of-wa-state-pertussis-cases-are-in-the-vaccinated-skagit-county-health-department/
Myth busted: Vaccinations are not immunizations
http://www.naturalnews.com/035871_vaccination_immunization_myths.html
Well, I am a nurse and one of my favorite patients is a middle aged man that was brain damaged by the pertussis vaccine. He has the mentality of a 2 year old. Does that change your perspective at all?
I just finished reading A Stolen Life by Marge Grant, about her son being severely and permanently damaged by the DPT in 1961. She has spent her life carrying for her quadriplegic, mentally retarded son at home. She got the ball rolling in raising awareness of the dangers of the pertussis vaccine and helped in the production of the program Vaccine Roulette, and appeared on a Phil Donahue show with her damaged son around that time. She includes accounts of some of the many other parents of children severely damaged by the DPT vaccine. Barbara Loe Fisher wrote A Shot in the Dark with many more true accounts of babies’ reactions to the DPT, including the horrific deaths of many of them, deaths written off as SIDS, even when the medical examiners admitted that they were really caused by the vaccine. Her book was instrumental in getting the DPT taken off the market, replaced by the much less effective and unfortunately still very dangerous DTaP.
Again, it comes down to the fact that both the diseases and the vaccines can damage or kill. Parents must do extensive research before deciding what course to take.
Jessica,
I can understand your point of view, given your training as a nurse and your experience. But those who have replied to you are right. Even though the vaccine-preventable diseases can kill, the vaccines for them are more dangerous. I said I didn’t want my baby to get the hep-B vax at the hospital when she was born, as I had read even back then, 2000, that it often caused autism: I had tested negative for hep-B, there was no reason to give it to her. But they gave it to her at midnight the first day, and she reacted with four days and nights of endless screaming, vaccine-induced encephalitis. She got the DTaP at 2, 4, and 6 months, which I now know offers no protection from pertussis at all at that age, at least the first two. She then caught pertussis at a La Leche League meeting when she was eight months old, and gave it to me. We had miserable long coughing bouts ten coughs a breath, she would cough up sheets of mucus at the end of the bout. She coughed over a month, I over two months, and then we both got well and now have another twenty to sixty years worth of immunity. I’m glad we got it and no longer have to give it a second thought. Pertussis has become much milder than it was a hundred years ago, and is no longer usually dangerous to any but newborns, among whom as many as one in a hundred may die if they get it. Since the vaccine is dangerous even in its new acellular form (asthma, allergies, seizure disorders, SIDS, and autism), no one should be pressured to get it. Parents should be advised of keeping their newborns in quarantine at home for their first four or five months. Even a huge percentage of people who have recently gotten vaxed can still transmit pertussis to their babies. Statistically, eleven of the fifteen babies who have died in this year’s epidemic caught it from appropriately vaccinated people.
Measles is not a killer disease, I had it when I was six, at a time when all children were expected to get it and no one worried about it. It should be taken seriouisly, the patient kept in bed in a darkened room, and kept well-hydrated, given vitamin A if serious complications are feared, but beyond that the vast, vast majority of people do fine and make a full recovery with permanent immunity and the ability to protect their babies in their first, most vulnerable year. The MMR really does cause autism and/or bowel disease in a large number of those who take the vaccine: Dr. Wakefield’s study was only discredited by Big Pharma and its minions, see Judge Mitting’s exoneration of Dr. Wakefield’s colleagues back in March of this year.
Parents should read books by Aviva Jill Romm and Wendy Lydall on caring for children with vaccine-preventable diseases, and read Dr. Mayer Eisenstein and Vaccine Epidemic for chilling studies and figures on the immense damage done by vaccines. Parents should definitely be aware of possibly dangerous symptoms like a stiff neck with fever possibly being meningitis. But I reacted to a tetanus vaccine with brachial plexus neuropathy and MS, and my daughter with bowel disease and autism: neither of us will ever take another vaccine. Those who are unwilling to risk permanent damage from vaccines should consider doing likewise.
I dont think very quick on my feet…I am the type who gets flustered and cant engage in this kind of conversation. I took my kids to the doctor and was getting the “talk”. He proceeded to try and scare me into vaccinating my kids by telling me there was a whooping cough outbreak in XX county (which happened to be one county over). I politely thanked him for his concern and reminded him that I lived 4 counties over (approx 150 miles). He didnt have much to say at that point. Needless to say we will not be going back there agin.
I also really upset doctors when they try to scare me with the vaccine talk by telling them “well that ilness doesnt frighten me”. They really think I am an idiot then…he he he
Just dealt with this issue today. Thanks for the advice!
Here’s one I always hear: “the toxins in vaccines are in such small amounts that they are not harmful. Your body just flushes them out.” I can never think of an intelligent response to this. Can you help me out here? I’m also one of those who gets too flustered to think of a response in the heat of the moment and can think of a million hours too late. Thanks for the read and th guide!
Melissa, ah yes, that one. “The toxins in an individual vaccine may be in a fairly small dose, but we don’t give one vaccine at once — we give up to 6. This can add up to extremely high levels of toxins, which are difficult for people to clear, especially small babies. People also have varying abilities to clear toxins, with some struggling to clear them at all, which is why some show up with low levels of mercury or aluminum in hair or urine samples despite a high level being injected.”
David, the link you provided from Skagit county, do you know that Skagit County, WA has an unvaxed rate of 10% of kindergartners? Ten percent! With ten percent of children not vaxed, that is putting older children who have waning immunity at risk. That is why we are seeing so many older children with pertussis in Skagit, Whatcom, and Snohomish counties in WA State. Because all three counties have unvaxed rate of 10%.
That isn’t true in California or other areas, however. Pertussis is outbreaking in highly vaccinated communities there. But bottom line, families should have the right to choose. Period. If those families whose children have “waning immunity” want, they can get boosters. Of course pertussis isn’t that dangerous to a middle schooler anyway, but that’s up to them.
Kathy, Your theory about the pertussis outbreaks in Skagit county is not based on fact. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a myth. Dr. Blaylock explains this very well. Vaccines loose their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given.
“What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. At least 50 percent of the population has been unprotected for decades.
If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95 percent. Yet we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50 percent or less of the population having vaccine protection.
Herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades, and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations”.
Even Dr. Anne Schuchat, of the CDC, admitted several months ago that this year’s pertussis epidemic has not been caused by unvaccinated people, and she asserted that most of the people getting the disease had been appropriately vaccinated. It’s just not a very effective vaccine (whle remaining very dangerous). I’ve seen newspaper articles which I think are preparing the way to bring back the more effective, but even more dangerous, DPT. They say that the DPT was taken off the market for causing transient fever and rash in some people, without mentioning the brain damage and paralysis which it caused by the thousands. Parents beware, and read A Shot in the Dark!
Jessica, I agree with you.
I find it kind of sad that what you’re agreeing with is that you have the right to FORCE others to vaccinate. You’re certainly welcome to make that decision for your family, and accept any vaccines you would like to have. But I remain firm in my assertion that no one has the right to force their opinion on others.
In response to the above post about the three day old baby dieing from pertussis , I have heard similar stories from MD friends of mine and my question to them was, the baby was three days old and in eligible for a pertussis vaccine, the mother and anyone vaccinated can still act as a carrier for the disease even if they show no or mild symptoms. How is the vaccine making pertussis preventable, for that baby, in any way? It can not. The answer as stated above is breastfeeding, as long a mom is exposed first they baby is realativly safe. My daughter was not vaccinated and will not be. She has been healthy and happy even though my husband and I have contracted colds and even a nasty case of viral pink eye(in spite of sleeping next to me before I knew I had it). Why because she was given my antibodies.
Breastfeeding may not provide much protection against whooping cough (pertussis), though it protects against many other diseases and provides optimal nutrition. Dr. Suzanne Humphries has designed a protocol for treating infants with pertussis, high doses of vitamin C are effective treatment, and alternating the anthroposophic remedies Pertudoron 1 and 2. Unfortunately, the baby must be up on the parent’s shoulder duriing all coughing fits to help him cough up the mucus from undeveloped lungs, which means holding him up and rocking or walking around with him all night for the duration of the coughing phase. But this is still better than risking the vaccine. Parents should quarantine their infants at home for the first four or five months, and make what choices seem appropriate for their individual situation if there’s any pertussis in their community durinig those months, maybe masks and gloves, no contact with siblings or anyone except the caregiver(s), seeking caregivers who have had the natural disease and are therefore immune.
Jessidca…I mean seriously. Not trying to seem derogatory but parent cocooning for protection against pertussis is being renounced all over because of it’s complete failure rates. If cocooning doesn’t work, and the baby was only 3 days old, this was an unpreventable death. Unfortunately, we cannot completely eradicate disease. That is a very poor argument and also very predictable….you’ve had scare tactis embedded into your brain.
One of my closest friends is a Vaccine Pusher, and I explained to her politely that it was my choice to whether to vaccinate or not and that my sister who had been vaccinated fully had measles three times as a child.
Also, personally, both myself and my daughters father have cousins who were vaccinated and then suffered autistic-like issues.
Kayleigh;
Those are some excellent points, my friend! It’s a gamble whether one vaccinates or not. There is a chance that some of these vaccines work, but at what cost? Personally, if there is a safer way to protect my children, I’d want to go with that.
The problem is, although alternative medicine is surprisingly effective and powerful, it is also ridiculed because it isn’t the money maker that mainstream drugs are. It both saddens and scares me that corporations are truly are becoming the leaders of the free world. When I learn about the many people like you who value liberty, it gives me hope that they won’t win the world over.
Thank you for the encouragement! It is always appreciated.
I’m soooo glad to meet people who see things my way! Thank you so much for this post; well said!
I’m so tired of the people who say I’m hurting their children by not vaccinating my children. I usually tell them that vaccines aren’t fully protective and aren’t a panacea. If they were there’d be no epidemics EVER, because the percentage of un vaxed children is not equal to epidemic percentages EVER.
This argument would be more effective and less inflammatory without the use of straw man arguments and generalizations such as “most vaccine pushers” do such and such. It sounds like you are venting so it is hard to take it very seriously. As a registered nurse I consider myself a vaccine pusher, which is why I was interested in this. Just a friendly suggestion from someone with a different perspective. I do respect other people’s right to choose even though I strongly encourage vaccinations. Have a nice day
Someone who believes in others’ right to choose is not a “vaccine pusher” per se. A “pusher” is someone who believes that vaccines ought to be 100% mandatory, for everyone, no exceptions at all. That is what I take offense to. People who believe strongly in vaccinations but also believe in the right to choose are not an issue. It’s the whole “lack of choice” that is unacceptable to me.